|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 45 post(s) |
Zyella Stormborn
Green Seekers
609
|
Posted - 2013.01.22 03:20:00 -
[1] - Quote
Roime wrote:I also echo the concern that balancing could have been more easily done by
- reducing armor rep cycle time (reps happen at the end of cycle anyway) - reducing armor rep fitting costs - reducing armor rep cap usage - increasing armor rep hull bonuses to 10%
This proposed solution forces armor tankers to learn another new skill (we just had to train RAH skill), increases the already massive fitting cost imbalance even further while doing nothing to the cap issue or making the 7.5% hull bonus any more worthwhile.
This
This
This
/wishing i could put more than +1 There is a special Hell for people like that, Right next to child molestors, and people that talk in the theater. ~Firefly |
Zyella Stormborn
Green Seekers
610
|
Posted - 2013.01.22 04:20:00 -
[2] - Quote
Shaak'Ti wrote:Zyella Stormborn wrote:Roime wrote:I also echo the concern that balancing could have been more easily done by
- reducing armor rep cycle time (reps happen at the end of cycle anyway) - reducing armor rep fitting costs - reducing armor rep cap usage - increasing armor rep hull bonuses to 10%
This proposed solution forces armor tankers to learn another new skill (we just had to train RAH skill), increases the already massive fitting cost imbalance even further while doing nothing to the cap issue or making the 7.5% hull bonus any more worthwhile.
This This This /wishing i could put more than +1 ! WARNING ! Carebears crying for permatanks ! Burst tanks FTW ! AAR made for PvP... hell yeah.. go back to your rainbowland with your shiney fitting farmers :P
*chuckle* This is what you got from that? Troll on with your oddly named self. ;)
There is a special Hell for people like that, Right next to child molestors, and people that talk in the theater. ~Firefly |
Zyella Stormborn
Green Seekers
613
|
Posted - 2013.01.22 20:15:00 -
[3] - Quote
Always found the speed argument... odd. Ships are in space. Armor ships should have the same speeds as shield.
I can see them being less agile, and taking more time to get to full speed or stop however.
Just a random thought. ;) There is a special Hell for people like that, Right next to child molestors, and people that talk in the theater. ~Firefly |
Zyella Stormborn
Green Seekers
615
|
Posted - 2013.01.23 13:23:00 -
[4] - Quote
Moonaura wrote:So, time to rattle the cage.
The common theme in this thread is that some how 'Armor tanking' sucks. Given the agility, speed and signature bonuses incoming, that is one problem often stated, but this is being reduced dramatically in these changes and armor still has a much reduced signature and the mid slots to be able to do something about being slower.
Most of the Amarr engineering groups, who seem to have a pathological fear of mid slots, would like a word with you concerning a great number of their ships. There is a special Hell for people like that, Right next to child molestors, and people that talk in the theater. ~Firefly |
Zyella Stormborn
Green Seekers
617
|
Posted - 2013.01.24 16:59:00 -
[5] - Quote
Ribikoka wrote: Example of idiotism. And a 1600mm plate is a boss module ? Double facepalm. Pls dont post anymore.
Constantly attacking people and / or throwing insults just about every post does not help the thread, or your credibility.
If you don't agree, or have a correction, break it down, and beat them up with your take on it, or your view. But please try to keep it civil. This thread so far is a great one with several different views, but its one that is being watched and read carefully by the Devs, and they are listening.
I'd hate to see it devolve into some troll flame fest just because you can not see someone elses view or disagree with it.
~Z There is a special Hell for people like that, Right next to child molestors, and people that talk in the theater. ~Firefly |
Zyella Stormborn
Green Seekers
620
|
Posted - 2013.01.25 14:58:00 -
[6] - Quote
Untouchable Heart wrote:Zyella Stormborn wrote:Ribikoka wrote: Example of idiotism. And a 1600mm plate is a boss module ? Double facepalm. Pls dont post anymore.
Constantly attacking people and / or throwing insults just about every post does not help the thread, or your credibility. If you don't agree, or have a correction, break it down, and beat them up with your take on it, or your view. But please try to keep it civil. This thread so far is a great one with several different views, but its one that is being watched and read carefully by the Devs, and they are listening. I'd hate to see it devolve into some troll flame fest just because you can not see someone elses view or disagree with it. ~Z Idiotism is idiotism, no matter how you trying with your alt. The 1600mm plate is a normal module.
? ?
1) <--- Main 2) I did not make any comments about the plate. There is a special Hell for people like that, Right next to child molestors, and people that talk in the theater. ~Firefly |
Zyella Stormborn
Green Seekers
621
|
Posted - 2013.01.28 16:07:00 -
[7] - Quote
Takeshi Yamato wrote:Armor repairers are meant to be more sustainable, whereas shield bosters are meant to have a stronger peak tank.
If we compare the cap efficiency though, a T2 shield booster + boost amp combo has 13% higher cap efficiency compared to double reps of the equivalent size, while also having a 14.75% stronger tank.
The only thing that makes armor repairs "more sustainable" are cap recharge mods, which don't apply in PvP except on capitals.
The capacitor usage of of small, medium and large armor repairers should be reduced. That will give active armor tanking in PvP the edge in sustainability it is supposed to have. Active armor tanks in PvE could use the buff as well, since they are clearly less popular than shield tanks.
I agree with this There is a special Hell for people like that, Right next to child molestors, and people that talk in the theater. ~Firefly |
|
|
|